Fair Sentences
Posted by konstantin otto on: 2005-07-07 23:07:06
"Objective Subjectivity is to appreciate the subjectivity own by a being,
without to try deform it [contaminate] with the subjectivity of the
appreciator!" Josif Visarionovitsch Djugaschvilli [otherwise STALIN]
Sentences are divided in " Sincere and Honest" and " False and Dishonest".
The second group is extremely complicated and it doesn't fit to be analyzed
here [do to author's intellectual incompetence - note by translator]. The group remained we divided in: "Perfect sentences" are the Divine ones and
"Imperfect Sentences" are the Human ones.
Some sentences express facts [observed phenomena] and other desires [phenomena that should happen].
Opening the window: "it is cold!" or looking at the thermometer: "thermometer shows 12ºC", the first sentence is "subjective". The second, in the case of analog thermometer is less subjective. In the case of the digital thermometer the second sentence is objective!? But all the three sentences judges "tangible phenomenon".
Other sentences on the "tangible" natural phenomena: "Delbert is cheerful
and happy". -"Delbert's brain is replete of endorphins", are expressing the same phenomenon in a different way, they are almost totally impersonal and almost without any nuance of desire [subjectivity].
The sentence: "Rain should begin et 21 hours and finish at 4 hours, et
7 hours it should already be everything dry and the sun should shine!"
this sentence express the desire or the opinion [judging quality of the weather/climate] or the two!
Sentences that judge the intangible phenomena [moral, faith and justice]
are found in instincts. Most of the people possess almost identical
instincts. Nor like this a groups with genetic deviations. It is difficult
to analyze and to seek differences in almost equal judgments. But the
extremities, where the differences are expressive, are easy to analyze.
A student during a lively party declared, sincerely and solemnly:
"A MAN should be entitled to a woman a week!" the sentence was hazy;
hard to understand the meaning, lack to explain what is "right" in this
private case [in his conception]. The more lately it happened an injustice"
[according to his conception], the MAN [the student] was arrested;
because he disembowel [gutted] several women [what was "his right"].
An assaulter assaults a girl, this steps in the accelerator and flees,
the assaulter shoots the girl in back and kill her. The assaulter made "justice" according to his conception.
The sentence regarding intangible phenomenon is found in the individual
conception and this changes from individual to individual. Therefore a
universal Justice is a Chimera. In Catalonia, until Great Pompous,
Roman governor, prohibit, wealthy admirers god's BAAL bought offerings
in fair, in Public Square. Great Pompous prohibited the sale in public;
ahead the sale was made in privacy. The Inquisition prohibited the
offerings of human being to BAAL and it punished offenders with death in
the fire. Since then the offerings are done in secrecy. The author of
the present has stand by e trial of a group of seven worshipers of BAAL.
The "acquired right" practiced during the millennia was undermined.
The credo freedom is one of the fundamental freedoms. In spite of this
most people finds correct to suppress this freedom brutally. It is the
conception of the justice of most that [almost] forms the laws.
The exclusionists seek a Chimera the "absolute justice". Stalin had six
fingers on each foot. And as all abnormal ones he wanted to change the
world. God created the man with five fingers and for that reason Stalin
was expelled of the seminar.
Download Coffee Break Screen
http://oz.pro.br/coffee/coffee.zip
Sao Paulo, May of 2003 Konstantin 0tto
About the Author
I am mathematics teacher. I write the articles, in four languages, since 1946.
Respectfully, konstantin otto c. botschkowski oz@oz.pro.br