Submit your article  Contact us 
Automotive
Business
Communications
Computers & Technology
Education
Entertainment
Finance
Food & Drink
Health & Fitness
Home & Family
Internet
Kids & Teens
Law & Legal
News & Society
Self Improvement
Shopping
Sports & Recreation
Travel & Leisure
Women's Interests
Writing
Book Marketing
Copywriting
Public Speaking
Teleseminars
Writing Articles
  

To Think for Oneself

Posted by By Laurent Grenier  on: 2005-06-19 22:36:41


Let us examine the three purposes of writing: to inform, entertain, and enlighten. To me, the second one is bottom of the list, though it is instrumental in the achievement of the two others. Every great teacher knows this intimately and readily laces his teachings with relevant and interesting stories, and humor.

The first purpose, to inform, comes second in my mind, whereas the last, to enlighten, comes first. To explain my attitude, I think it appropriate to draw your attention to my book A REASON FOR LIVING, where both of these purposes are pursued.

Part of my book relays factual or theoretical information about things like human physiology, nutrition, and universal evolution. This information relates to the current perception of reality in scientific circles. I am just a vehicle for it. Now, for two reasons, my role as a writer who informs about scientific facts and theories those among his readers who are ignorant of them comes second in my mind to my role as a thinker who strives to enlighten his readers, particularly those who are fumbling for meaning in their darkest days.

My main reason is that I regard wisdom as paramount, whereas the knowledge of the material world (i.e., the constituents, structure, and workings thereof) is not equally important, however useful it is on a practical level. Conscience comes before science, which in itself is incapable of providing humans with a sense of what is good, right, or sacred – in a word, with moral principles. An example of science without conscience is the destruction of nature and the violation of human rights by rogue companies who are efficient in their use, or rather abuse, of their environment and their workers to satisfy their greed.

My other reason is that my role as a writer who informs about scientific facts and theories those among his readers who are ignorant of them is indeed that of a mere vehicle. It is very much secondary to the role of researcher, which drives the scientific enterprise thanks to advanced instrumentation plus skillful, scholarly, and clever observations and rationalizations.

By contrast, my role as a thinker who strives to enlighten his readers, particularly those who are fumbling for meaning in their darkest days, is in the driver's seat, so to speak. Not only is it concerned with everything that makes life worth living and gives humans a sense of purpose, but also it does more than mirror the light of wisdom; it generates it by force of thinking on the basis of experience and study.

Truth to tell, my readers can likewise think for themselves (this applies to those among them who are fumbling for meaning in their darkest days). They themselves can be thinkers and create their own wisdom while discovering and evaluating mine. Therefore, the light shining through in my book is there to help my readers see a range of weighty matters on which they can meditate to form their own thoughtful opinions about them. And since they can do so, I venture to argue that they should.

Laurent Grenier’s writing career spans over twenty years. During this time he has broadened and deepened his worldview, by dint of much reflection and study, and in the end has crafted “A Reason for Living,” his best work to date.

Official web site: http://laurentgrenier.com/ARFL.html







Copyright 2005 Articles Magazine